I have not featured any jewellery on Echostains for quite a while so I have been looking for something really unusual – something that can send me into flights of fancy. I am writing this on the birthdate of the Faberge egg (29th May 1885 – 1917), the day the Faberge egg was ‘laid’. The Faberge egg is instantly recognisable – sumptuous, bejewelled and opulent. These eggs were developed in Russia by the House of Faberge (1885 – 1917) The miniature eggs were Easter gifts, that were given singly and were sometime worn on a neck chain.

The larger more famous eggs (also known as the ‘Imperial’ eggs) were originally made for Alexander 111 and Nicholas 11 of Russia. Only 50 of these eggs were made, and 42 have survived.
The Karelian and Constellation eggs, planned for 1918 were destined never to be delivered. Nicholas 11 and his whole family died in an assasination that year and the year before Nicholas had abdicated. The eggs themselves are gorgeous, opulent and seen as a symbol of luxury – jewellers masterpieces. But it is not these little baubles which once hung from necklaces which caught my eye, but this strange face distorting jewelery by Burcu Buyukunal.
My first question is ‘why?’ How does this enhance the face? By distorting her face, do we then notice how attractive the woman really is? They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, different ‘looks’ have their admirers, as do fashion, design ect. Maybe one day ‘beauty’ will be played down to be the new beauty. It is this example which reminded me of how Elizabethan ladies used to paint their faces white and how patches made of velvet were used on the face in the 18th century to disguise blemishes, make the face appear even whiter or draw attention to certain facial features depending on where they were placed.

‘Her patches are of every cut,
For pimples and for scars;
Here’s all the wandering planets’ signs,
And some of the fixed stars.’
In this very short video we see the owner of the painting ‘Une Dam a sa Toilette’ by French painter Francois Boucher ( 1703 – 1770) explain the delicate operation of patch application. Boucher ‘s art is known for his voluptuous and idyllic subject matter which is well suited to the Rococo style. His patroness was the famous Madame Pompadour, he painted many portraits of her.
There are also accessories which are used to glamourise. Whirls of cigarette smoke enveloping beautiful women in black and white movies lend such mystique and intrigue to the silver screen. The actuality is rather different. Cigarette Smoke permeates everything it touches, including, flesh, clothes and hair – there’s nothing mysterious about that, but I was quite tickled about this cigarette collar – though I think they missed a trick by not making it a prisoners or slave’s collar to emphasis the entrapment of the noxious weed.
The ‘chain’ association is still there though, and there is something of the chain smoking beagle about this collar. These types of collars are not new though – the actual shape
of the ruff collar goes back to the sixteenth century and were worn by men, women and children. The pleats of the ruff was accomplished by the use of cone-shaped goffering irons. which were heated. Ruffs were made from a lot of material. Elizabeth1 had a ruff of ‘ten yards for the neck and hand’. During starching, ruffs could be coloured with vegetable dyes, though Elizabeth herself disapproved of the light blue colour;-
“Her Majesty’s pleasure is that no blue starch shall be used or worn by any of her Majesty’s subjects, since blue was the color of the flag of Scotland”
Stiff collars, smooth complextions, disguises used as enhancements – beauty will always be subjective and is indeed in the eye of the beholder.
Karelian egg image here
Lots of these beautiful eggs here
Distorting jewlery from here
Patchbox from here
Video by AndSper with thanks
Romanov Assassination information here
More about Boucher here
Smoking Dietrich from this article
Elizabeth1 image here
The verse and the source of a lot of delightful information about the history of the patch can be found in Chambers Book of Days
I understand that F set up the production site and hired the craftsmen but never made anything himself.
Hope this throws some light on who exactly made the eggs Carl http://www.fabergetheperfectgift.com/firm.html He was miles ahead of Damien Hirst:-)
What an interesting post . The only thing I knew anything about were the eggs because my Mother used to talk about them. Thank you, Lynda, for more info!
Thanks Leslie – these posts are getting few and far between I’m afraid, but I am working on something good so stay tuned:-)