Happy Birthday Cindy Sherman!

Today is the birthday of conceptual portrait photographer and film director Cindy Sherman.  Sherman was born in New Jersey USA 1954.   She received the MacArthur award in 1995 and currently lives and works in New York.  She studied visual art at Buffalo State college, abandoning  painting for photography.

“I didn’t want to make ‘high’ art, I had no interest in using paint, I wanted to find something that anyone could relate to without knowing about contemporary art. I wasn’t thinking in terms of precious prints or archival quality; I didn’t want the work to seem like a commodity.”

Although a lot Sherman’s work involve the use of stereotyping women in advertising, media  and film, she does not stereotype her work,  she does say this about her work:-

“The work is what it is and hopefully it’s seen as feminist work, or feminist-advised work, but I’m not going to go around espousing theoretical bullshit about feminist stuff.”

 
 
 
 
 

Cindy Sherman Clowns series

 

 Her work involves taking series of photographs of herself in costume.  For example in 2003 her series consisted of photographs of herself as clown.  In 1981 an early series ‘Centrefolds’ considered women’s roles in film magazine and television;-

“In content I wanted a man opening up the magazine suddenly look at it with an expectation of something lascivious and then feel like the violator that they would be. Looking at this woman who is perhaps a victim. I didn’t think of them as victims at the time… But I suppose… Obviously I’m trying to make someone feel bad for having a certain expectation”

 
 
 
 
 

Centrefolds

 

Sherman’s narrative work always has dark or sad undertones within it.  She always maintains that her photographs are not self portraits, even though the pictures are all of herself.  Sherman always plays a ‘type’ – a fictional type;- a housewife, socialite, – B movie actresses.  She  both hides herself within her work, yet reveals herself at the same time.  It is a game of hide and seek where she sometimes disappears:-

“I feel I’m anonymous in my work. When I look at the pictures, I never see myself; they aren’t self-portraits. Sometimes I disappear”

 
 
 
 
 

Cindy Sherman 1990

 

Her work is both thought-provoking and evocative.  As well as directing and modeling, she has also collaborated on advertisements with designer Marc Jacobs and designed album covers for the band American Babes in Toyland.

If I knew what the picture was going to be like I wouldn’t make it. It was almost like it was made already.. the challenge is more about trying to make what you can’t think of.”  

Cindy Sherman

Information about Sherman and her work can be found here and on her website here

images are from here, here here and here

video by innertubevideo with thanks!

Also born on this day Paul Cezannne – read my post here

Don’t forget the Hepworth Echo Poetry challenge which is still going strong over on my Bookstains!

And

Advertisements

12 Responses to “Happy Birthday Cindy Sherman!”

  1. I find her images very intriguing and interesting. BUT, I cannot relate to the women in them. Perhaps this is because of the ‘roles’ CS is portraying them in–and the confines of each. These are the ‘boxes’ women often inhabit in our culture. I think it’s long overdue that we all walk OUT of such confines. Men too. It would make life so much more interesting, dont’ you think?

    • Yes I do! And I take your point about the roles she is portraying, but all those women started out as just ‘ordinary’ women and then got got ‘placed’ or elevated into boxes (by men), so perhaps CS is giving us a chance to ‘unsee’ them and see whats underneath. What I find intriguing is the exposure/concealment glimpses she gives us regarding these women. Glad you enjoyed this post 🙂 Did you see the CS short film I put on here called dolls clothes? I LOVE it!
      https://echostains.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/valley-of-the-broken-dolls/

  2. You’ve introduced me to someone new here, Lynda, although some of the images seem familiar. I particularly like the clown. I’ve always found them scary and yet inviting too, something about humour and tragedy being so close to one another. I’ll certainly search for more on this woman.
    Great post!

  3. Wow, she is a very dynamic photographer.
    Incredible talent.
    .
    I’ll take part in this challenge but i might need some time as it will have to be put into a video.
    I no longer do written posts

  4. The idea of being the “star'” in her own work? Who does not aspire to that? These women could be anyone and I don’t think it gives us, as women any role to fit into as we all create who and what we are. That is what I see her doing. Thanks for this interesting post.

    • I don’t think the idea is to be the star of her own work at all Leslie and I don’t think we as women always choose the role we ‘fit’ into and that is the point of her work. All art including conceptual art, where the idea is the key factor, interests me and I shall be putting more on my blog as well as abstract work. I realise I can’t please everybody, but I must be true to myself 🙂 Glad you found the post interesting and your comment and opinion is always appreciated 🙂

      • Perhaps I don’t word myself correctly. I know it was not the intent of the artist to be a “star” but anyone who acts out a part in any drama is the “star”. The other part of what I said is that we only play those roles if we think we do. Someone else’s perception.

        • Point taken Leslie, but ‘star’s are only ordinary people, it’s others which elevate them. They are only playing a role, acting out a part – there’s a real person in there and that’s what the artist is trying to show – a dichotomy of what we see and what we don’t see real/unreal.

  5. artistatexit0 Says:

    I will confess that I’m not a huge fan of Cindy Sherman’s art. Her work became the very thing she says she’s against which is art as commodity. And as a man, I don’t completely buy into this view of woman as victim either. What ever happened to free will?

    • Free will? Even women buy into stereotyping whilst crying ‘freedom’. For example having the ‘right’ and the ‘choice’ of filling perfectly healthy breasts with silicone. Then choosing to exploit these – for men. Very liberated…… but their ‘choice’ I suppose. Victim or Victor? Double edged sword. To each his/her own I say 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s